<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for W4FT on Amateur Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://w4ft.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://w4ft.com</link>
	<description>One ham&#039;s skewed view of amateur radio and maybe some other topics along the way.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:06:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CQ WW SSB 2011 &#8211; mixed results by w4ft</title>
		<link>http://w4ft.com/2011/11/cq-ww-ssb-2011-mixed-results/comment-page-1/#comment-4862</link>
		<dc:creator>w4ft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w4ft.com/?p=517#comment-4862</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-4859&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@ZS2EC  &lt;/a&gt; 

Patience, Tom. It hasn&#039;t been that long since the contest.  Results often take 6 to 12 months to be published, depending on the contest. Check the CQ website at http://cq-amateur-radio.com/cq_contests/cq_ww_dx_contest/index_cq_ww_dx_contest.html for the results of this one, when they&#039;re published.

73,
W4FT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-4859" rel="nofollow">@ZS2EC  </a> </p>
<p>Patience, Tom. It hasn&#8217;t been that long since the contest.  Results often take 6 to 12 months to be published, depending on the contest. Check the CQ website at <a href="http://cq-amateur-radio.com/cq_contests/cq_ww_dx_contest/index_cq_ww_dx_contest.html" rel="nofollow">http://cq-amateur-radio.com/cq_contests/cq_ww_dx_contest/index_cq_ww_dx_contest.html</a> for the results of this one, when they&#8217;re published.</p>
<p>73,<br />
W4FT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CQ WW SSB 2011 &#8211; mixed results by ZS2EC</title>
		<link>http://w4ft.com/2011/11/cq-ww-ssb-2011-mixed-results/comment-page-1/#comment-4859</link>
		<dc:creator>ZS2EC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w4ft.com/?p=517#comment-4859</guid>
		<description>I WANT TO KNOW MY RESULTS FOR 2011 THROUGHLY ENJOYED THE CONTEST</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WANT TO KNOW MY RESULTS FOR 2011 THROUGHLY ENJOYED THE CONTEST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 80 meter Skywave loop replaces HGSW by w4ft</title>
		<link>http://w4ft.com/2012/01/80-meter-skywave-loop-replaces-hgsw/comment-page-1/#comment-4593</link>
		<dc:creator>w4ft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w4ft.com/?p=546#comment-4593</guid>
		<description>RE: HGSW Antenna performance
In the post, I gave the impression that the HGSW performance wasn&#039;t very good.  The fact is that &quot;MY&quot; HGSW wasn&#039;t working very well.  I looked briefly at the antenna when I took it down and it seemed to be suffering from a number of mechanical problems, like failures at joints, corrosion, etc. 

We have used this antenna for a couple years at the W4DW Field Day operation on 15 and 20 meters with great success. If you are considering this antenna, it is definitely worth a try. I think that as an antenna on it&#039;s design frequency, or as an alternative to a dipole, it is a great choice! 

73,
W4FT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: HGSW Antenna performance<br />
In the post, I gave the impression that the HGSW performance wasn&#8217;t very good.  The fact is that &#8220;MY&#8221; HGSW wasn&#8217;t working very well.  I looked briefly at the antenna when I took it down and it seemed to be suffering from a number of mechanical problems, like failures at joints, corrosion, etc. </p>
<p>We have used this antenna for a couple years at the W4DW Field Day operation on 15 and 20 meters with great success. If you are considering this antenna, it is definitely worth a try. I think that as an antenna on it&#8217;s design frequency, or as an alternative to a dipole, it is a great choice! </p>
<p>73,<br />
W4FT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High Gain Single Wire Beam to replace 80m dipole by W4FT on Amateur Radio &#187; 80 meter Skywave loop replaces HGSW</title>
		<link>http://w4ft.com/2010/10/high-gain-single-wire-beam-to-replace-80m-dipole/comment-page-1/#comment-4592</link>
		<dc:creator>W4FT on Amateur Radio &#187; 80 meter Skywave loop replaces HGSW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w4ft.com/?p=306#comment-4592</guid>
		<description>[...] week, I replaced the HGSW beam with a full wavelength 80 meter Skywave Loop Antenna. The antenna is about 285 feet long and is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, I replaced the HGSW beam with a full wavelength 80 meter Skywave Loop Antenna. The antenna is about 285 feet long and is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CQWW SSB on the HGSW and a new Water Tank! by w4ft</title>
		<link>http://w4ft.com/2010/12/cqww-ssb-on-the-hgsw-and-a-new-water-tank/comment-page-1/#comment-3861</link>
		<dc:creator>w4ft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w4ft.com/?p=335#comment-3861</guid>
		<description>Hi Gordon,

You&#039;re right, I didn&#039;t put much info in on this article on the design of the antenna.  Might be because the details were in the one immediately preceeding this one.   

   http://w4ft.com/2010/10/high-gain-single-wire-beam-to-replace-80m-dipole/#more-306 

Three important things for you to know. First, I cut mine for 20 meters.  I wasn&#039;t terribly precise, which I think contributed to it not matching up on 20 as well as our field day version for 15 meters did. 

Second, I feed the antenna with 100 ft of 450 ohm ladder line for better performance.

Third, and you&#039;ll love this, the antenna&#039;s inventor updated the design by removing the coil to get a near 50 ohm impedance. ;-) Details on this and a few other changes are in a follow-up letter published about 6 months later in QST.

You&#039;ll no doubt want to go to the link above and read the details, especially the paragraph following the table with the swr readings.  Also, it&#039;s a good idea to run an external antenna tuner with this one.  I am using an MFJ 993B automatic tuner, which gives me pretty good performance on all bands from 160 to 10.  It was good for a over a quarter million points in the CQ WW SSB a few weeks ago!

73, 
W4FT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gordon,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, I didn&#8217;t put much info in on this article on the design of the antenna.  Might be because the details were in the one immediately preceeding this one.   </p>
<p>   <a href="http://w4ft.com/2010/10/high-gain-single-wire-beam-to-replace-80m-dipole/#more-306" rel="nofollow">http://w4ft.com/2010/10/high-gain-single-wire-beam-to-replace-80m-dipole/#more-306</a> </p>
<p>Three important things for you to know. First, I cut mine for 20 meters.  I wasn&#8217;t terribly precise, which I think contributed to it not matching up on 20 as well as our field day version for 15 meters did. </p>
<p>Second, I feed the antenna with 100 ft of 450 ohm ladder line for better performance.</p>
<p>Third, and you&#8217;ll love this, the antenna&#8217;s inventor updated the design by removing the coil to get a near 50 ohm impedance. <img src='http://w4ft.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Details on this and a few other changes are in a follow-up letter published about 6 months later in QST.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll no doubt want to go to the link above and read the details, especially the paragraph following the table with the swr readings.  Also, it&#8217;s a good idea to run an external antenna tuner with this one.  I am using an MFJ 993B automatic tuner, which gives me pretty good performance on all bands from 160 to 10.  It was good for a over a quarter million points in the CQ WW SSB a few weeks ago!</p>
<p>73,<br />
W4FT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CQWW SSB on the HGSW and a new Water Tank! by Gordon Jones W5OU</title>
		<link>http://w4ft.com/2010/12/cqww-ssb-on-the-hgsw-and-a-new-water-tank/comment-page-1/#comment-3859</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Jones W5OU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w4ft.com/?p=335#comment-3859</guid>
		<description>&quot;CQWW SSB on HGSW and a new Water Tank&quot; :

Hello W4FT:  I can not discern from the referenced article as to which &quot;size&quot; (Band) the antenna was cut for?  You gave me more infromation on the Water Tank than you did on the antenna.  Did you have that [expletive removed, ed.] coil left in the antenna?
I made one for the ten meter band.  Never have I been able to get the SWR any where near a &quot;good place&quot;.  I&#039;m going outside and remove the coil - right now!  Then I&#039;ll see if it works within reason.
73, Gordon - W5OU   e-mail me at: </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;CQWW SSB on HGSW and a new Water Tank&#8221; :</p>
<p>Hello W4FT:  I can not discern from the referenced article as to which &#8220;size&#8221; (Band) the antenna was cut for?  You gave me more infromation on the Water Tank than you did on the antenna.  Did you have that [expletive removed, ed.] coil left in the antenna?<br />
I made one for the ten meter band.  Never have I been able to get the SWR any where near a &#8220;good place&#8221;.  I&#8217;m going outside and remove the coil &#8211; right now!  Then I&#8217;ll see if it works within reason.<br />
73, Gordon &#8211; W5OU   e-mail me at: </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bike MS New Bern 2011 by Rick Yost</title>
		<link>http://w4ft.com/public_service_support/bike-ms-new-bern-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-3193</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Yost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w4ft.com/?page_id=481#comment-3193</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all your hard work, Cliff! I appreciate the waypoints for each of the correlating cue sheet turns! Now I just have to figure out a way for my GPS to not display the waypoints that are duplicated. If you know of a way to do this, I would certainly appreciate any tips you have. I’m thinking the only way to do this is delete all waypoints on my GPS that are not part of the route I’m monitoring. 

73,
Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all your hard work, Cliff! I appreciate the waypoints for each of the correlating cue sheet turns! Now I just have to figure out a way for my GPS to not display the waypoints that are duplicated. If you know of a way to do this, I would certainly appreciate any tips you have. I’m thinking the only way to do this is delete all waypoints on my GPS that are not part of the route I’m monitoring. </p>
<p>73,<br />
Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So whaddya think? by Gary</title>
		<link>http://w4ft.com/ham-accessories-for-sale/buyer-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3014</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 11:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w4ft.com/?page_id=132#comment-3014</guid>
		<description>Purchased a couple of Icom OPC-1186 cables from Cliff. Separation cables for my Icom IC-2720H mobile unit. These cables are not that easy to come by these days, so it was great that I found Cliffs page via Google. Cliff sold me the cables at a great price &amp; service &amp; delivery were fantastic. Thanks to Cliff, my mobile unit is back in service. I&#039;ll be sure to be back here anytime I need something for my amateur needs. thanks. 73 Gary, N2GLS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purchased a couple of Icom OPC-1186 cables from Cliff. Separation cables for my Icom IC-2720H mobile unit. These cables are not that easy to come by these days, so it was great that I found Cliffs page via Google. Cliff sold me the cables at a great price &amp; service &amp; delivery were fantastic. Thanks to Cliff, my mobile unit is back in service. I&#8217;ll be sure to be back here anytime I need something for my amateur needs. thanks. 73 Gary, N2GLS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Strip injects WPTF into my SSB signal??? by w4ft</title>
		<link>http://w4ft.com/2011/03/power-strip-injects-wptf-into-my-ssb-signal/comment-page-1/#comment-2612</link>
		<dc:creator>w4ft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w4ft.com/?p=400#comment-2612</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2575&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Kent KC0DGY  &lt;/a&gt; 
Good suggestion, Kent. For most problems like this, it would help, but I&#039;m using an industrial 6 ft. power strip with no LEDs.  It probably doesn&#039;t have any electronics besides a switch and some wires and plugs.  I haven&#039;t opened it up to find out yet though.

Frankly, I&#039;m guilty of not following up on a bunch of stuff, including this.  People have asked me about the performance of the RigBlaster Advantage and the HGSW beam antenna, but I really haven&#039;t spent enough time on the radio to give them a fair assessment.   Instead, I&#039;ve been focused on a kitchen remodel.
73, 
W4FT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2575" rel="nofollow">@Kent KC0DGY  </a><br />
Good suggestion, Kent. For most problems like this, it would help, but I&#8217;m using an industrial 6 ft. power strip with no LEDs.  It probably doesn&#8217;t have any electronics besides a switch and some wires and plugs.  I haven&#8217;t opened it up to find out yet though.</p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m guilty of not following up on a bunch of stuff, including this.  People have asked me about the performance of the RigBlaster Advantage and the HGSW beam antenna, but I really haven&#8217;t spent enough time on the radio to give them a fair assessment.   Instead, I&#8217;ve been focused on a kitchen remodel.<br />
73,<br />
W4FT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Strip injects WPTF into my SSB signal??? by Kent KC0DGY</title>
		<link>http://w4ft.com/2011/03/power-strip-injects-wptf-into-my-ssb-signal/comment-page-1/#comment-2575</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent KC0DGY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 19:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w4ft.com/?p=400#comment-2575</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll bet its in the LED or the surge protection part of your power strip (the LEDs can act as detector diode).  I would suggest either putting in some RF bypass ceramic disc caps if you can get inside the power strip, or put one of those snap on ferrite toroid style RF chokes on the power line right where the power line goes into the power strip.  I had a strong local AM station get into my telco line and a few turns of the phone line through a ferrite downstream from their demark point totally cleaned my AM station problem up. Good luck. Kent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll bet its in the LED or the surge protection part of your power strip (the LEDs can act as detector diode).  I would suggest either putting in some RF bypass ceramic disc caps if you can get inside the power strip, or put one of those snap on ferrite toroid style RF chokes on the power line right where the power line goes into the power strip.  I had a strong local AM station get into my telco line and a few turns of the phone line through a ferrite downstream from their demark point totally cleaned my AM station problem up. Good luck. Kent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

